Case:
Calum vs the Rotisserie Chicken.
Plaintiff(s):
Defendant(s):
Court Acknowledgement:
-
"N/A"
Bailiff Acknowledgement:
-
"N/A"
Ruling:
In Favor of Plaintiff.
Case Summary:
Calum participates in a home game over Zoom. During this game, on multiple occasions, Defendant proceeded to eat an entire rotisserie chicken during the game. Calum believes this behavior is distracting, while Defendant argues that it can't be smelled so "it's fine". The defendant also claims that it adds to the atmosphere of the campaign.
Verdict:
Justice Axford suggests allowing the Defendant to continue as long as the microphone is muted, but Justice Murph believes that an "entire animal" is too far for a mid-game snack. Justice Caldwell believes the other PCs should be utilizing this as an opportunity for razzing. Finally, Justice Hurwitz invoked the Five Napkin Precedent, any food that requires multiple napkins is not welcome at the D&D table.
Assenting: 3
Dissenting: 0
In Abstention: 1
Sentence:
Defendant is remanded to the chicken, where he must be trapped for 8 years.