Case:
DMs vs Fudged Rolls.
Court Acknowledgement:
-
"N/A"
Bailiff Acknowledgement:
-
"N/A"
Ruling:
No Verdict.
Case Summary:
This is a class action suit, brought forth by Seth C., addressing concerns that players may be fudging rolls while playing virtually.
Verdict:
The court suggests that DMs employ passive-aggressive tactics such as sharing articles about players cheating rolls and bringing in virtual rollers for high-stakes moments where the anticipation and result is immediately shared with the whole table.
Dissenting: 0
In Abstention: 0
Sentence:
When a player stops fudging their rolls, reward them with a rotisserie chicken.