Case:
NPC Stealth vs The Players.
Plaintiff(s):
Defendant(s):
Court Acknowledgement:
-
"N/A"
Bailiff Acknowledgement:
-
"N/A"
Ruling:
In Favor of Plaintiff.
DM
Case Summary:
Zach (DM) had an NPM antagonist perform a stealth check and subsequently gain advantage on their first attack against their players. This was done after the players had failed to beat the stealth check with their own perception checks. Zach is concerned that the players passive perception may have beaten the stealth and that advantage should not have been granted.
Verdict:
The bench believes that Zach ran this encounter correctly and that passive perception is unlikely to be used while mid-combat as the player(s) are more focused on the battle at hand.
Dissenting: 0
In Abstention: 0
Sentence:
The bench will stealthily sneak up to these players and replace their drinking water with pool water.