Case:

Elemental Adept vs Oath of Ancients.

Plaintiff(s):

Defendant(s):

Court Acknowledgement:

-

"N/A"

Bailiff Acknowledgement:

-

"N/A"

Ruling:

In Favor of Plaintiff.

Case Summary:

Turner and his friend play level 20 1v1 when they can't get a full group together. The question of this case lies in competing class features. Turner in an Elemental Adept so their fire spells overcome resistance to fire (effectively negating the resistance), however his opponent is an Oath of Ancients paladin who has resistance to all damage from spells. Turner believes that his Elemental Adept ability would negate that resistance, while his opponent believes otherwise.

Verdict:

Justice Murph sides with the plaintiff that the resistance should have been overcome. Justice Axford concurs.

Assenting: 3

Dissenting: 0

    In Abstention: 1

    Sentence:

    Turner's friend must be executed with a fire beam.